| Re: [AD] Exception Support for Allegro |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Exception Support for Allegro
- From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 01:33:47 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=qhVrMjf4haWDEI/3AAXzGDAYkVIt0KUJ/8Y+gm6TnltahypevfRwLW0qyKjIN9+lc9uDG0kEZosoCRx38VMmhe+OqRqNPETteMX8CpsaSKQDdnEQr5DXyrWIaGt/Me9pax/bBPRi0Eu+1Q+IQ/lm1CBv2u4+hyHwhJhA3pn+J0g=
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 01:14 am, Serge Semashko wrote:
> Exceptions are C++, allegro is C, so I don't think it is a good idea.
Why not? People use Allegro with C++, people use C++ callbacks, but they can't
throw exceptions from callbacks without the switch. As I understand the
manual, it doesn't sacrifice any speed so the only things you get by not
using it are a few saved bytes and users who can't throw C++ exceptions from
callbacks.