[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] makedoc
- From: Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 18:27:42 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=Z8LiRYI+YfsGzTRn/NUAhSNTkdnazIWbvP4GgcnunbdfuyNa19PnRSgf+gip5EJXtriRSLu2vjGteJXGwqPsYug47Lw474ReqLQC/t/SCv+BZBQ1D0FTEY21X1Ufo7yxgbDqCeyRPumszA5M2+7AuXNJR4R2OpE3wDGHldf6eGY=
On August 5, 2005 06:10 pm, Peter Wang wrote:
> On 2005-08-05, Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Actually, there's a small problem with entries like
> >
> > d_box_proc
> > d_shadow_box_proc
> >
> > Maybe in the XML output, it should just copy the function description to
> > both?
>
> API entries sharing descriptions is not supported yet. I didn't want to
> do it the first time around as it just makes things more complicated.
The perl script now more closely matches the dtd and the haskel output, except
it clones descriptions ;) I'm not sure what the other differences are..
Except that it seems to create a couple duplicate id's.. OH well.
> Peter