Re: [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again
From: Hrvoje Ban <spoofer255@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:13:07 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ty918uF8rqAiI6WzuWEpjxyCkH/G6y3zqVlGJ9NdBFrrAAGkDu2AJ1do/XS/lfjqow81XIqNTTmpYa1MXUG5dmM1EhAgIngL9KkmIuFroFp0XjT3CYTyBPWj6YGyJ03e1/AfIeSVbewswXsM60e4UbjyN/UyF9i4nrLYLCWsMFk=

On 7/30/05, Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

True. It's the same you do in windows - instead of storing the address
of the main function in a function pointer, you simply call it.

But surely someone thought of that in the past discussions on this topic
- so there must be another catch.

I didn't found anything in archives about this "catch", but this solution by Chris looks interesting: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=10216287

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again
  - From: chris . kcat

References:
- [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again
  - From: Hrvoje Ban
- Re: [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again
  - From: Hrvoje Ban
- Re: [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again
  - From: Hrvoje Ban
- Re: [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again
  - From: Elias Pschernig

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again
Next by Date: Re: [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again
Next by thread: Re: [AD] END_OF_MAIN, again

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/