Re: [AD] Allegro 4.2.0 RC1 timetable

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On Saturday 04 June 2005 22:25, Michal Molhanec wrote:
> no, this proposal was dismissed because it would require detection if 
> it's used MinGW or DJGPP

Do you remember why that matters? I can't imagine why...

Evert




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/