Re: [AD] Allegro 4.2.0 RC1 timetable |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]
On Saturday 04 June 2005 22:25, Michal Molhanec wrote: > no, this proposal was dismissed because it would require detection if > it's used MinGW or DJGPP Do you remember why that matters? I can't imagine why... Evert
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |