Re: [AD] [PATCH] Solaris Fixes and dev notes |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
I've commited the attached patch that should incorporate all of teh changes
you mentioned. Please confirm if it does indeed work.
Evert
Index: aclocal.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/alleg/allegro/aclocal.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.77
diff -u -r1.77 aclocal.m4
--- aclocal.m4 24 May 2005 14:58:27 -0000 1.77
+++ aclocal.m4 12 Jun 2005 07:59:35 -0000
@@ -218,6 +218,19 @@
AC_MSG_RESULT($allegro_procfs_argcv)
dnl
+dnl Test for getexecname() on Solaris
+dnl
+dnl Variables:
+dnl allegro_sys_getexecname=(yes|no)
+dnl
+AC_MSG_CHECKING(for getexecname)
+AC_DEFUN(ALLEGRO_SYS_GETEXECNAME,
+ [AC_CHECK_LIB(c, getexecname,
+ [allegro_sys_getexecname=yes], [allegro_sys_getexecname=no])]
+)
+AC_MSG_RESULT($allegro_sys_getexecname)
+
+dnl
dnl Test for X-Windows support.
dnl
dnl Variables:
Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/alleg/allegro/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.90
diff -u -r1.90 configure.in
--- configure.in 24 May 2005 14:58:27 -0000 1.90
+++ configure.in 12 Jun 2005 07:59:37 -0000
@@ -448,6 +448,14 @@
fi
fi
+dnl Test for Solaris like getexecname().
+ALLEGRO_SYS_GETEXECNAME
+if test "$allegro_sys_getexecname" = yes; then
+ AC_DEFINE(ALLEGRO_HAVE_GETEXECNAME,1,
+ [Define to 1 if you have getexecname])
+fi
+
+
dnl Test for X-Windows support.
ALLEGRO_ACTEST_SUPPORT_XWINDOWS
if test "$allegro_support_xwindows" = yes; then
Index: src/unix/usystem.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/alleg/allegro/src/unix/usystem.c,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -r1.34 usystem.c
--- src/unix/usystem.c 12 Mar 2005 06:29:06 -0000 1.34
+++ src/unix/usystem.c 12 Jun 2005 07:59:38 -0000
@@ -319,6 +319,8 @@
#ifdef ALLEGRO_HAVE_SV_PROCFS
struct prpsinfo psinfo;
int fd;
+ #endif
+ #if defined ALLEGRO_HAVE_SV_PROCFS || defined ALLEGRO_SYS_GETEXECNAME
char *s;
#endif
char linkname[1024];
@@ -327,11 +329,26 @@
FILE *pipe;
pid_t pid;
int len;
+
+ #ifdef ALLEGRO_HAVE_GETEXECNAME
+ s = getexecname();
+ if (s) {
+ if (s[0] == '/') { /* Absolute path */
+ do_uconvert (s, U_ASCII, output, U_CURRENT, size);
+ return;
+ }
+ else { /* Not an absolute path */
+ if (_find_executable_file(s, output, size))
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ s = NULL;
+ #endif
/* We need the PID in order to query procfs */
pid = getpid();
- /* First try a Linux-like procfs */
+ /* Try a Linux-like procfs */
/* get symolic link to executable from proc fs */
sprintf (linkname, "/proc/%d/exe", pid);
if (stat (linkname, &finfo) == 0) {
@@ -353,9 +370,12 @@
/* Use argv[0] directly if we can */
#ifdef ALLEGRO_HAVE_PROCFS_ARGCV
- if (_find_executable_file(psinfo.pr_argv[0], output, size))
- return;
- #else
+ if (psinfo.pr_argv && psinfo.pr_argc) {
+ if (_find_executable_file(psinfo.pr_argv[0], output, size))
+ return;
+ }
+ else {
+ #endif
/* Emulate it */
/* We use the pr_psargs field to find argv[0]
* This is better than using the pr_fname field because we need the
@@ -367,6 +387,8 @@
if (s) s[0] = '\0';
if (_find_executable_file(psinfo.pr_psargs, output, size))
return;
+ #ifdef ALLEGRO_HAVE_PROCFS_ARGCV
+ }
#endif
/* Try the pr_fname just for completeness' sake if argv[0] fails */