Re: [AD] load_datafile_object using index

[Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 17:49 +0200, spoofer255@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I think this is it. Inside attachment.

Looks good. Just a minor thing I noticed when reading the patch: For the
filename allocation, it would be simpler to do:

index->filename = ustrdup(filename);

This can be done by whoever applies it though (to new_api_branch), no
need to create a new patch.

And about the naming, I find create/destroy is more consistent, since
the index, unlike the single datafile objects, is created/destroyed
instead of loaded/unloaded.

-- 
Elias Pschernig