Re: [AD] timer_mutex again

[Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Eric Botcazou wrote:

> > Thanks, I'll add that.  But this is not something that could happen with
> > the existing code, is it?  If so, I'm stumped seeing how it could arise.
> >    
>
> What existing code? 

The code sitting in CVS HEAD, with the assumption that 
ALLEGRO_MULTITHREADED is #defined (which currently is not true for 
nearly all ports).

> The timer code _with_ the mutex guarantees that this 
> cannot happen.  The timer code _without_ the mutex doesn't.
>  

Right.

Peter