Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 02:40:52 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BwYwKEC4V/LTH/huFdaj9qUyPrYMcGWPmYtJ+seb7MZsUvkgHcDvcjM+7zMoOcriQX73LvA/UnKPWXP+P7VFG/Ve7adQv8ajQOE+WrtCU+iVYBo3CyVEmHLB5ESa7qCQfEkCZIdG1IwMxnmZqcqvDl1/dJMkX+bsmlZ1aG3Qtvo=

guilt wrote:

It doesn't change a bit, right? So what's the problem.


Dependancies and licensing.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
  - From: guilt
- Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
  - From: Elias Pschernig

References:
- [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
  - From: guilt
- Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
  - From: Chris
- Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
  - From: guilt
- Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
  - From: Chris
- Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
  - From: guilt

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+