Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 01:08:36 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GP/6L4WOIsGvKf/VpnkvRI6R6pDMnPRzmWaWDuDOdew2LWbt+AG2V/2g53K1HF65bIe/IIo9N1MqcnJus+Ey8HjYdaXVPHn4FOvmyCxJXH/+TFOdT21xD4cFZ2d+Lqq9JGyOER89OhyLgn9Jd9dD2JmmnYpXsLrcqF/pbdF+8vU=

guilt wrote:

like, if Allegro could support
AVIs than just FLICs or OGGs than just VOCs and WAVs, or PNGs than
just LBMs .. :)

I can add Theora, Vorbis, and PNG support into the library right nowwithout breaking anything currently in it (I could proably even do AVI,except AVI is just a container format that holds just about any videoand audio format conceivable). Seperating the library won't change thatone bit.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
  - From: guilt

References:
- [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
  - From: guilt
- Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
  - From: Chris
- Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
  - From: guilt

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Allegro generalization/extension mechanism

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/