Re: [AD] todo

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 08:48 +1100, Peter Wang wrote:
> >
> >Well, this isn't fixed. Does anyone know how all the misc/dep*.sh
> >scripts are supposed to work?
> >
> 
> How do you mean?

To me, regular expressions are just gibberish, most of the time :P I
guess, they somehow simulate a C parser though, looking for the #ifdef
SCAN_DEPEND and #include statements in files. Still, letting cpp do this
would seem more reasonable. And there was at least 2 patches recently to
include things into the dependency scripts which had been missed, the
one by me costing me a lot of confusion before realizing that something
simply wasn't rebuilt :P

> Maybe it was to avoid a dependency on `gcc', as opposed to some other 
> `cc'?  But getting rid of the dep*.sh scripts would be really good.
> 

Yes.. but a dependency on gcc would be weaker than a dependancy on sed.
So, I'd say, we should leave it in the TODO in any case, until someone
gets around and tries to come up with a cleaner solution.

-- 
Elias Pschernig





Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/