[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] get_volume()
- From: Elias Pschernig <allefant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:10:18 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=e2gvxSx4uYGxjOriYEU2o9hYISdnC1SUS/8vKXsAffUarxV7yNTBek4fDIuFTu5UKpMaSFuf0BmDcQxmKAn+pxfGENk/p0DvWF9C0cIR5DzWXXdjTw+cZfNV4RaZXRfjWmzl+PDU0vp9N0w+pXVP+rdM7LsHO9YYCpdjcMEn7ds=
>
> For 4.2, no, it shouldn't use the al_ prefix. Do you have a concrete
> example on the `possibly more info' you want to return?
>
Well, my suggestion was to return a struct with possibly more info. I
assume, this could be things like a translated description, or
ASCII-only description, or maybe even a pointer to the vtable, or
something else. For now, I guess the .id .name and .desc members of
the driver structure would be all.