| Re: [AD] Miscelaneous issues |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 17:50 +0200, Evert Glebbeek wrote:
> > Hm. I guess not. Also, the old, documented fields were removed. But
> > there's nothing that can be done about it, and they shouldn't have been
> > used by any code despite being documented. So, the best thing is
> > probably to just make it an opaque structure. Evert: Should I create a
> > new patch, or apply with the change?
>
> Your patch arrived for me at the same time as this message (damn
> sourceforge), so I didn't take too close a look at it. Peter knows more
> about it than I do anyway, so as far as I'm concerned it's ok if you apply
> it with the change.
>
> > Yes, that's why I called it "quick docs" :P I completely agree though :)
>
> Doc polishing is something we can do between beta and release anyway. I'd
> just prefer to have some skelleton docs in beta rather than none :)
>
Ok, I just committed it - with the only change the removed documentation
for the internal PACKFILE fields.
--
Elias Pschernig