| Re: [AD] Problem with web docs? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Problem with web docs?
- From: guilt <karthikkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:34:45 +0530
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=MRD8D8OjTtngyKhq+qUsYqOS8w9gRDPMt8yOBVad4iz1ZNiRgdYPf5a0Zwz/q9YfJ3V6Khew8k9UMeHS8tt2x23RgDUUybWt0cAV/wVeCRqQ6pXDWEs9AMgnFy67MVw6KzwaR9pl73tN0wkAwYyLYTuZIIMkdexXmcHXHq9oe2g=
Hmmm :) Update the docs to generate an index.html file... It would
actually be a nice idea because anybody who would like to set up the
Allegro documentation on his/her web server will find it convenient.
It makes filename completion easier, as well :)
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:00:02 +0100, Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 15:23 +0530, guilt wrote:
> > IMHO, the index.html should first be restored to allegro.html and a
> > new index.html should do a HTML redirection to allegro.html :)
> >
>
> Or maybe, we should drop "allegro.html" completely.. even someone
> reading the html docs offline will look for an "index.html". There's no
> way to know that allegro.html actually is the one to open.
>
> --
> Elias Pschernig
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> --
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers
>
--
Karthik
http://guilt.bafsoft.net