Re: [AD] -Wno-unused

[Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Daniel Schlyder wrote:

> Dustin Dettmer:
>  
>
> > According to my understanding, the correct way to achieve that is be not
> > including the variable name.
> >    
> I don't think that is valid C. I get "parameter name omitted" error with
> MinGW GCC 3.4.2. It works in C++, though. As I said in my other mail, GCC's
> 'unused' attribute will work. 
>  

This is the portable way:

int foo(int x, int y)
{
   (void)y;
   return x;
}

Peter