Re: [AD] -Wno-unused

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] -Wno-unused
From: Daniel Schlyder <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:38:43 +0100

Elias Pschernig:
> Well, my guess is, there would be lots of warnings without it.. for code
> which is completely legitimate, e.g. the gui procs which don't use the c
> parameter.

For GCC, we could use the 'unused' attribute to silence those. If other
compilers have similar capability, perhaps we should add a AL_UNUSED macro
for this?

--
Daniel Schlyder
http://bitblaze.com/

References:
- [AD] -Wno-unused
  - From: Dustin Dettmer
- Re: [AD] -Wno-unused
  - From: Elias Pschernig

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] -Wno-unused
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Proposed documentation update.
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] -Wno-unused
Next by thread: Re: [AD] -Wno-unused

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/