| Re: [AD] Re: [AL] allegro DTD |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On December 3, 2004 05:38 pm, Stepan Roh wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > Its rather difficult working with an incomplete dtd... "what would be
> > nice" is no what we need. Someone needs to take a good look at the
> > current docs, and see what is needed now, and what will be needed in the
> > near future.
>
> I think the only missing thing is an example reference (the
> added-in-version flag is also nice addition). But I won't be the one
> adding it, because this little step into the light is coming to the end
> and I'm going back to shadows :-) It's time for someone to learn DTD.
> However I'll read and answer mails.
I think I remember there being another thing I wanted, but I keep forgetting
it.
I supose I can work on learning DTD then. oy. such an obtuse format.
> Have a nice day.
>
> Stepan Roh
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx
http://strangesoft.net