| Re: [AD] Re: [AL] allegro DTD |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Re: [AL] allegro DTD
- From: Elias Pschernig <allefant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:10:56 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=TBHxkWZbfIHSjYjgPT66n2uUEhp/OdNMM2lTFGr/2PmeiumXnHz7DgrYwweLGy8P10KtmbH6DRZCSz9ZgdllKH9yDgmq/k3fYhjS3MZXA1N1ZSrpjUmAAeTbK6C016X3pTJWIfuiZKdZEOpAiBx/ir7s5LfU3QIYb7A9Q+dUm78=
> I agree (well, I don't find the current _tx format that hard to edit, but
> then again, I'm not much of a doc writer ;)). I think we should keep an
> Allegro documentation format around.
> Elias: I like .alx, but I'm not sure that it's obvious that it's a text
> file...
well, short for "allegro tex" :) And _tx also more looks like some
sort of internal compression format.