Re: [AD] Proposed pedantic asserts

Re: [AD] Proposed pedantic asserts

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] Proposed pedantic asserts
From: Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 19:44:40 +1100

Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz wrote:

On 2004-12-07, Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Looks good, for the function names that I could make out. The diff -poption would probably be useful here.
Indeed.

Great, seems fine.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Proposed pedantic asserts
  - From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz

References:
- [AD] Proposed pedantic asserts
  - From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz
- Re: [AD] Proposed pedantic asserts
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] Proposed pedantic asserts
  - From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Merged in 4.1.17 into new_api_branch
Next by Date: [AD] scancode_to_name change
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Proposed pedantic asserts
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Proposed pedantic asserts

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/