Re: [AD] XOR drawing under X11 (and what is _xwin_in_gfx_call)

Re: [AD] XOR drawing under X11 (and what is _xwin_in_gfx_call)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] XOR drawing under X11 (and what is _xwin_in_gfx_call)
From: Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:29:08 +0100

On Friday 26 November 2004 16:14, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> Yes, gcc will inline them either way - but inlining can't hurt. It
> should be AL_INLINE then. And for 4.3.x, let's drop AL_INLINE as well as
> AL_STATIC. The only compiler without them must be sunos gcc 2.8.1 or
> something :P

Also BCC and Watcom, I think.
Ok, bad example... :x

Evert

References:
- [AD] XOR drawing under X11 (and what is _xwin_in_gfx_call)
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] XOR drawing under X11 (and what is _xwin_in_gfx_call)
  - From: Chris
- Re: [AD] XOR drawing under X11 (and what is _xwin_in_gfx_call)
  - From: Elias Pschernig

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] XOR drawing under X11 (and what is _xwin_in_gfx_call)
Next by Date: [AD] BeOS update
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] XOR drawing under X11 (and what is _xwin_in_gfx_call)
Next by thread: Re: [AD] XOR drawing under X11 (and what is _xwin_in_gfx_call)

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/