| Re: [AD] Keypad behaviour |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Keypad behaviour
- From: Peter Wang <novalazy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:31:58 +1100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=oMrC6ZOqLCjC1E93WpgxJmIzV10sqrlAMnbPo6f9eUiIT6d5ejqxlJKcZaI+sPoFc17YyFDox14hB4cXNK/RAC3h0/r1wqTWXftIIWVGLCgb2EiGQzpGI7zBBPGk0z1r7Tw4nDSifuoAhZBqNymK95e3ruOUsV4rpsFZLo9YkWM=
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:49:13 +1000, Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I came across a problem with the linux keyboard code. If you have
> numlock off and press a numpad key, e.g. KEY_4_PAD, key[KEY_LEFT] will
> be set. When you release KEY_4_PAD, key[KEY_LEFT] will not be unset.
>
> This bug can be solved without too much trouble, but I was wondering if
> we should just take out this misfeature of rerouting the numpad keys to
> other keys depending on whether the numlock is on or not. All
> pckeys.c-based drivers will have this feature (e.g. DOS & Windows) but X
> doesn't. I'm not proposing the change pckeys.c, but just to remove the
> feature from the linux driver. Patch attached.
Committed.