Re: [AD] #define dependancy patch |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] #define dependancy patch
- From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 02:28:33 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=a8x2Sd8UvmRug8EHGfrMRChmzndM5JaXUpZH9keWfWlP21K9I0pyfHPEir8L+1fdNuVXvKI/4JCUx43skRbpKFof1MXiC/QwhDDLJVi5FWF1DjAvnt4RyZ1gNWUy24GRsh6C2eSClFQBTC+d2O8pK6gO79fxW00sfJVEid36wnc=
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:15:54 +0200, Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> GFX_HAS_VGA is not defined.
>
> > Is VGA enabled?
>
> No.
>
> > What about modules?
>
> If that's teh default, then yes.
>
> > You sure the patch applied properly?
>
> Yes.
I have a feeling the makefile isn't including misc/modex.c for some
reason (the blank split_modex_screen is defined there). Strange that I
don't have any problem here when I do --disable-vga..
> I fixed it by checking against GFX_HAS_VGA in both test.c and exscroll.c
> and Allegro now builds properly. Still testing if it works as it should.
GFX_HAS_VGA isn't intended to be exposed.. at least that's not my intention.
- Kitty Cat