[AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers <alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
From: Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 13:36:16 +0200

Does anyone know the reason for using "" in the examples? This makes gcc
search in the current directory first - which is kind of pointless. But
it also doesn't hurt. Still, in my own programs, I always use #include
<allegro.h>, so maybe we should modify the examples to use the same. Or
was there another reason for the ""?


-- 
Elias Pschernig

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [AD] Mouse cusor documentation
Next by Date: [AD] 4.1.16 WIP changes
Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: Re: [AD] Mouse cusor documentation
Next by thread: RE: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/