Re: [AD] Optimization flags? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
> [About -frename-registers]
>
> No, but the way I understand it, it helps more with the more registers
> you have.. so even if you're kinda limited on registers, you could
> still get some benefit. And what about the PPC?
Yes, it should theoritically be more beneficial on RISC cpus. But I'm not
sure in practice. Maybe on IA-64.
> Of course it'd be bigger (though I wouldn't imagine by mutch?), but
> I'm surprised it's slower. Any particular reason?
Cache trashing.
> [About -funswitch-loops not being the default]
>
> Not according to:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.2/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#Optimize-
>Options
I'm skeptical about this one: while the concept looks theoritically nice, I
think it triggers very rarely in practice. And it could result in bigger
code too.
> [About -fweb]
> Couldn't hurt to try, but unfortunately I don't have GCC 3.4 and I'm a
> little reluctant to try it (from what I hear it has some problems with
> older code).
This one is more interesting because it really helps the register allocator.
--
Eric Botcazou