Re: [AD] giftware license

[Ryan Norton <wxprojects@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> What do others think? This really isn't important, but having a proper
> recognized license sure is no harm. I attached a docs patch, which 
> would
> be applied together with adding a license.txt to CVS containing just 
> the
> MIT wording, and updating the web.

Well, MIT requires you to redistribute the license with your sources, 
right?

If you really need a "valid" license, you could always just put it in 
the public domain and be done with it :).

Regards,
Ryan