Re: [AD] Is there a need for allegro_umessage?

Re: [AD] Is there a need for allegro_umessage?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] Is there a need for allegro_umessage?
From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz <gradha@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:36:19 +0100

On 2004-09-13, Chris <kcat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to just make allegro_message aware of the
> current text format and convert to unicode as needed?

Looking at the implementation it is aware, so you can forget my
question. Possibly the fputs branch could be improved for unicode
aware terminals, but certainly it's not very relevant.

References:
- [AD] Is there a need for allegro_umessage?
  - From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz
- Re: [AD] Is there a need for allegro_umessage?
  - From: Chris

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Bug in 4.1.15's DirectAMX changes
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Bug in 4.1.15's DirectAMX changes
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Is there a need for allegro_umessage?
Next by thread: [AD] Regarding backwards compatibility of 4.1.x and 4.x where x >= 2

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/