Re: [AD] Re: CVS: allegro/demo demo.c,1.23,1.24

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


Evert Glebbeek wrote:
While I'm at it, I might as well fix the exupdate example in the same way...

Maybe someone should comb through the examples, as well. exupdate had a couple obsolete notes that this patch fixes.

- Kitty Cat
--- exupdate.c	2004-07-11 10:03:36.000000000 -0700
+++ exupdate.c	2004-07-11 10:13:49.000000000 -0700
@@ -170,11 +170,9 @@
 		      "    + can use hardware acceleration when it is available\n"
 		      "    - drawing directly to vram can be slower than using a memory bitmap\n"
 		      "    - requires a card with enough video memory for two screen pages\n"
-		      "    - some VESA drivers have nasty bugs in the scrolling functions\n\n"
 		      "3 = triple buffered (three pages of video memory)\n\n"
 		      "    + like page flipping, but faster and smoother\n"
 		      "    - requires a card with enough video memory for three screen pages\n"
-		      "    - only possible in mode-X (not win95), or with VBE 3.0 or VBE/AF\n\n"
 		      "4 = double buffered (system bitmap)\n\n"
 		      "    + as easy as normal double buffering\n"
 		      "    + system bitmaps can be hardware accelerated on some platforms\n"


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/