| Re: [AD] exupdate (was: Re: CVS: allegro/demo demo.c,1.23,1.24) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
> Maybe someone should comb through the examples, as well.
Wouldn't be such a bad idea...
> exupdate had a couple obsolete notes that this patch fixes.
Aren't those still valid in DOS though (yeah, I know, as if...)?
What about the attched patch instead?
Evert
Index: allegro/examples/exupdate.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/alleg/allegro/examples/exupdate.c,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 exupdate.c
--- allegro/examples/exupdate.c 11 Jul 2004 16:40:37 -0000 1.9
+++ allegro/examples/exupdate.c 12 Jul 2004 06:28:04 -0000
@@ -170,11 +170,17 @@
" + can use hardware acceleration when it is available\n"
" - drawing directly to vram can be slower than using a memory bitmap\n"
" - requires a card with enough video memory for two screen pages\n"
- " - some VESA drivers have nasty bugs in the scrolling functions\n\n"
+#ifdef ALLEGRO_DOS
+ " - some VESA drivers have nasty bugs in the scrolling functions\n"
+#endif
+ "\n"
"3 = triple buffered (three pages of video memory)\n\n"
" + like page flipping, but faster and smoother\n"
" - requires a card with enough video memory for three screen pages\n"
- " - only possible in mode-X (not win95), or with VBE 3.0 or VBE/AF\n\n"
+#ifdef ALLEGRO_DOS
+ " - only possible in mode-X (not in Windows), or with VBE 3.0 or VBE/AF\n"
+#endif
+ "\n"
"4 = double buffered (system bitmap)\n\n"
" + as easy as normal double buffering\n"
" + system bitmaps can be hardware accelerated on some platforms\n"