Re: [AD] TODO List for Allegro

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On Friday 23 July 2004 08:51, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> They are valid C. Since C99. IMO theres too much useful stuff in C99 for 
it to 
> be ignored. in //s case, most (if not all) of the compilers already 
support 
> it in C code...

Sure, but unless we explicitly decide that Allegro should no use C99 rather 
than C80, I'd rather not change this.
Besides which, I personally think //-style comments are plain ugly ;)

Evert





Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/