[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
I wrote:
I ran it 3 or 4 times, and it shows the same basic times. Quality 0 is
about 7ms faster per voice on my machine under test conditions
(mixertest.c was compiled with no optimization flags, btw).
This means just resting while a sample is playing is 0.07% less
efficient with quality 1 than quality 0 on my machine. Is this worth the
extra mixer, especially considering the quality loss with quality 0?
Sourceforge has been rather flakey with getting me the AD mails, so I
might not have heard everything that was said.
- Kitty Cat