| Re: [AD] Dat: relative pathnames |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
oops, didnt see the -r switch in the dat utilty. silly me!
------ Original Message ------
From: Jon Rafkind <workmin@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: 2003/07/03 23:15:39 (EDT)
Subject: [AD] Dat: relative pathnames
> I know the latest grabber can handle relative path names, but the dat tool doesnt seem to like this due to the new usage of canonicalize_filename. I added 2 lines of code to make it use relative filenames when using the -k switch. I think -k should be interpreted as keep everything original: filename and dataobjectname. Sorry for not using diff, but here is what i added:
>
> at line 410 in dat.c:
> if (!opt_keepnames) {
> strupr( name );
> for ( c = 0; name[c]; c++ )
> if ( name[c] == '.' )
> name[c] = '_';
> } else { // added
> strcpy( fname, name ); // added
> } // added
>
> If the -k switch is not proper for this, then please tell me a proper letter and I will make the appropriate changes.
> later--,
> jon