| [AD] [neilroy@xxxxxxxxxx: Re: [AL] JGMOD fixes] |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
This came in on [AL],
----- Forwarded message from Neil Roy <neilroy@xxxxxxxxxx> -----
Yeah, my fix is for the newest CVS version or v4.1.9(WIP). No fix
is needed for the current release version (which makes it hard to
maintain add-ons I might add)... I guess I could redo it to detect
which allegro version is being used, but the current method of version
numbers is a tad confusing in my opinion... 4.0.3 and 4.1.9? <shrug>
----- End forwarded message -----
I wrote back explaining the versioning number. Then I wanted to
mention the ALLEGRO_VERSION (et al.) constants, but noticed that I
can't find them in the docs anywhere. Is this intentional? If the
symbol is supposed to be public (which I think it is as it's in
include/base.h and not in internal) it should probably be documented.
I checked this for 4.0.2 and 4.0.3, not for 4.1.9.
Hein Zelle
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-<
Unix is user friendly. It's just very particular about who
it's friends are.
Hein Zelle hein@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.icce.rug.nl/~hein
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-<