Re: [AD] Relative paths in the grabber

Re: [AD] Relative paths in the grabber

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] Relative paths in the grabber
From: Ben Davis <bnd25@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 01:02:59 +0100
Organization: Cambridge University

> What was the benefit of converting everything to the forward slash? Testing
> only against '/' instead of against both '/' and OTHER_PATH_SEPARATOR?

No. Being able to create a datafile on Windows and then use 'dat -u' on it on 
Linux. This would require relative paths too (as the subject suggests).

Ben

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Relative paths in the grabber
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Re: [AD] Relative paths in the grabber
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] Relative paths in the grabber
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Relative paths in the grabber
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Relative paths in the grabber
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Relative paths in the grabber
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Relative paths in the grabber

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/