Re: [AD] Dat2c revisited

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] Dat2c revisited
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 21:47:23 +0200

> I found a new problem in dat2c:

Thanks for your obstinacy :-)

> the generated include guard is not guaranteed to be unique. I think it
> would be better if it contains the name of the header file rather than the
> string DAT2C. The date and time now added to the string are maybe not
> needed at all.

I agree to both assertions. Care to make a patch?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Dat2c revisited
  - From: Christer Sandberg

References:
- [AD] Dat2c revisited
  - From: Christer Sandberg

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [AD] Dat2c revisited
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Relative paths in the grabber
Previous by thread: [AD] Dat2c revisited
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Dat2c revisited

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/