Re: [AD] rand() vs random()

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers <alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] rand() vs random()
From: Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 25 May 2003 21:29:09 +0200
Organization:

On Sun, 2003-05-25 at 21:17, Sven Sandberg wrote:
> It's only guaranteed to be at least 32767, and Watcom (and maybe MSVC?) 
> equal this limit.

..and therefore also mingw, because is uses the MSVC runtime.

-- 
Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- Re: [AD] rand() vs random()
  - From: Angelo Mottola
- Re: [AD] rand() vs random()
  - From: Sven Sandberg

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] rand() vs random()
Next by Date: Re: [AD] rand() vs random()
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] rand() vs random()
Next by thread: Re: [AD] rand() vs random()

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/