Re: [despammed] Re: [AD] Re: [AD] Re: [AD] (±€°í)Â÷ŸÈÀÇ Žã¹è³¿»õ¿Í ? ³¿»õžŠ ±ú²ýÇÏ°Ô...!@ |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [despammed] Re: [AD] Re: [AD] Re: [AD] (±€°í)Â÷ŸÈÀÇ Žã¹è³¿»õ¿Í ? ³¿»õžŠ ±ú²ýÇÏ°Ô...!@
- From: Lo'oRiS il Kabukimono <lo_oris@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:36:41 +0200
- Organization: Freedom - Libertà
Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> :
> I can understand it for the AD list.. but not on the Allegro list. There
> are quite a few posts from people that arn't subscribed, and I don't
> think its worth loosing potential users by blocking non-subscribed
> posting...
simply, messages from non-subscribers could be moderated, and approved only
if non-spam.
--
"Never give up Never give in Be on our side So we can win
Never give up Never give in Be on our side
Old moon's time is soon to come"
- Blind Guardian, "And then there was silence"
http://lano.webhop.net ·-:=[asd]=:-· http://lano-forum.webhop.net