Re: [AD] masked_blit reversed?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: "Allegro conductors" <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] masked_blit reversed?
From: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 09:11:33 +0200
Invalid-uucp-from: From ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx Sat Sep 28 17:19:40 2002

> I do'nt think so - or at least I've never had to :)
> Perhaps we should document those "gotcha's"

Still quoting the docs: "The source and destination regions must not
overlap."

As I see no practical use for masked_blit()ing a bitmap onto itself, I don't
think it is worth while to lift the limitation.

--
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] masked_blit reversed?
  - From: Robert Ohannessian

References:
- [AD] masked_blit reversed?
  - From: Robert Ohannessian
- Re: [AD] masked_blit reversed?
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [AD] masked_blit reversed?
  - From: Robert Ohannessian

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] masked_blit reversed?
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Borken build
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] masked_blit reversed?
Next by thread: Re: [AD] masked_blit reversed?

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/