[AD] masked_blit reversed?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: Allegro conductors <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [AD] masked_blit reversed?
From: Robert Ohannessian <ohannessian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:42:24 -0400
Invalid-uucp-from: From ohannessian@xxxxxxxxxx Sat Sep 28 08:01:33 2002

Hi,

Currently, there is a special "reveresed" version of blit() to deal withoverlapping regions. Should there be the same for masked_blit()? Shouldwe declare that overlapping regions are undefined and remove thatversion of blit()? Or should we do The Right Thing (although timeconsuming and bug-prone) and make all blitters overlapping-region-safe?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] masked_blit reversed?
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] GFX_SAFE mode patch
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Request: adding textout_ex(), which takes bg color as parameter
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] GFX_SAFE mode patch
Next by thread: Re: [AD] masked_blit reversed?

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/