Re: [AD] Proposed ASSERT protection

Re: [AD] Proposed ASSERT protection

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] Proposed ASSERT protection
From: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 14:44:07 +0200
Invalid-uucp-from: From ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx Fri Sep 13 22:49:43 2002

> Perhaps there could be a `weakend' version of ASSERT than only prints a
> message to the console warning of a possible bug in the caller (Windows
> users are out of luck here)?

That's actually the way ASSERTs have worked for the Windows port since...
the dawn of mankind I'd say ;-) They only print warning messages that are
caught by any debugger.

- Eric

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Proposed ASSERT protection
  - From: Evert Glebbeek

References:
- RE: [AD] Proposed ASSERT protection
  - From: Vincent Penquerc'h
- Re: [AD] Proposed ASSERT protection
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [AD] Proposed ASSERT protection
  - From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz
- Re: [AD] Proposed ASSERT protection
  - From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz
- Re: [AD] Proposed ASSERT protection
  - From: Evert Glebbeek

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Proposed ASSERT protection
Next by Date: Re: [AD] al_window_close, 2nd pass
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Proposed ASSERT protection
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Proposed ASSERT protection

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/