Re: [AD] pack

Re: [AD] pack_ungetc

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: "Allegro conductors" <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] pack_ungetc
From: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:50:32 +0200
Invalid-uucp-from: From ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx Thu Jul 11 20:11:29 2002

> But first and foremost: do we fix pack_feof() ? The main drawback is the
> one described above. The main advantage (besides conformity) is to
> simplify the code in src/file.c

Meanwhile I've applied the attached patch that gets rid of several
unnecessary (and sometimes erroneous) calls to pack_feof() (the last one
is part of Peter's fix for the problem with empty packfiles).

--
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: packfeof.zip
Description: Zip compressed data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] pack_ungetc
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- [AD] pack_ungetc
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [AD] pack_ungetc
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: RE: [AD] pack_ungetc
Next by Date: Re: [AD] pack_ungetc
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] pack_ungetc
Next by thread: Re: [AD] pack_ungetc

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/