[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
I think all Annie's unicode/buffer overflow patches were applied,
if I'm not mistaken.
Let me know if you want me to send any of these.
--
Vincent Penquerc'h
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1DFB5.3372F070
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="windows-1252"
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>RE: [AD] sincos</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> That's precisely because I'd like your patches to be applied </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> now that I</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> suggested to add a 386 asm sincos() function. Otherwise only the DJGPP</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> version would see an improvement.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>You mean, rather than piggybacking to the implementation of the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>particular system ? Because I think it was using the glibc version</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>for Linux.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Anyway. Which ones do you plan to apply ?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From what I see, I posted:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>- sub bitmap original fix</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>- grabber sorting option</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>- MOUSE_BLIND GUI flag</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>- add -pipe to the compilation command line</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I think all Annie's unicode/buffer overflow patches were applied,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>if I'm not mistaken.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Let me know if you want me to send any of these.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-- </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Vincent Penquerc'h </FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1DFB5.3372F070--