Re: [AD] Mini-synchronization API proposal for 4.1.x

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: "Allegro conductors" <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] Mini-synchronization API proposal for 4.1.x
From: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 22:02:37 +0100

> I think this mini-API is long overdue because most ports now use threads.
> It could be useful for the users, as well as internally in order to
> synchronize parts of the platform-independent code (especially timers).

I've attached a patch for the high-level implementation (mutex.diff), as
well as a patch for the Win32 implementation (win_mutex.diff).

--
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: mutex.zip
Description: Zip compressed data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Mini-synchronization API proposal for 4.1.x
  - From: Peter Wang

References:
- [AD] Mini-synchronization API proposal for 4.1.x
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] 4.0.1 release
Next by Date: [AD] Switch callbacks under X
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Mini-synchronization API proposal for 4.1.x
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Mini-synchronization API proposal for 4.1.x

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/