RE: [AD] Proposal for an input model

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


> That's clearly the right question, and not only for the input 
> model. Allegro
> 4.0 may be bloated, but it assumes responsability for many 
> things in the
> background and is very easy to use thanks to that.

I think this ease of use is *the* defining feature of Allegro, and is what
seperates it from libraries such as SDL. I would hope that for all decisions
such as this, the "vision" of Allegro is preserved. Just a thought. :)

P Pridham



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/