| Re: [AD] Proposed changes for Allegro 5 (6?) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
> ... ok, just one response: I agree with Shawn about persistent state
> in libraries. To a certain degree it's unavoidable, but on the whole,
> it sucks. Ideally, every function call should be complete unto itself.
Totally agree, btw, methinks allegro 5 should include code to play
cd audiotracks
(sorry, there are just so many things i wonder when i think of a new allegro
version =)