| Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On 06 Nov 2001, salvador <salvador@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Does putting "static inline" in front make a difference?
> > I suppose it wouldn't...
>
> It solves the problem. The simple use of static also makes gcc silent.
Ok, thanks. A proposed patch is here (17k):
http://www.alphalink.com.au/~tjaden/dev/fixchanges.diff.gz
I didn't test except under Linux. It affects some kludges under
Watcom and SGI, and also an include under QNX, so those should get
testing too.