RE: [AD] documenting minor return values

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: conductors@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [AD] documenting minor return values
From: "Vincent Penquerc'h" <Vincent.Penquerch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:30:12 +0100

Title: RE: [AD] documenting minor return values

> > Alternatively, we can say "The return value is unspecified.", which
> > is fine by me, but I'm sure some purists here would disagree ;-)
>
> Unspecified ? Could there be some quantum effects around ? ;-)

Just that if we fancy some time, we can change them. Unspecified just means
"don't touch or you'll blow up" :)

--
Vincent Penquerc'h

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] documenting minor return values
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] DOS port instability under Win 9X
Next by Date: RE: [AD] DOS port instability under Win 9X
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] documenting minor return values
Next by thread: Re: [AD] documenting minor return values

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/