RE: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1

["Vincent Penquerc'h" <Vincent.Penquerch@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: RE: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1

> > If you have gcc 3.1, can you test it please?  I don't see
> why `fsqrt'
> > needs to be "built-in", whatever that means (ok, some optimisations
> > could probably be had).
>
> It looks like gcc 3.1 really takes it as an internal thing:

Try compiling with as ANSI compliant. I believe there can be no
such builtins then. This also means that there must be a libcall
to such a function. String stuff like strcpy are builtins as well
when compiling with optimizations.
Also, try taking the address of fsqrt, to see if it makes it treat
it like a libcall.
That *may* mean that a given combination of flags used in an
Allegro program would make GCC see these symbols as non-builtins,
but it might not be simple.

--
Vincent Penquerc'h