Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On October 30, 2001 05:59 am, you wrote:
> In reply to Sven Sandberg <svsa1977@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >[allegro.h]
> > #define key al_key
> >
> >but this macro breaks code like:
> >
> >[myheader.h]
> > typedef struct{
> > int key;
> > }FOO;
> >
> >[mycode.c]
> > #include "myhead.h"
> > #include <allegro.h>
> > FOO x;
> > x.key=0;
>
> Yes, you are correct. This is one of the very few instances where there
> is nothing we can do but ask users to change their code (in this case,
> move the inclusion of `allegro.h' to below the definition of `FOO').
what if FOO is defined as:
struct {
BITMAP *key;
} FOO;
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx
http://strangesoft.net