Re: [AD] another FAQ?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


> .globl foo
>         .type    foo,@function
> foo:
>         pushl   %ebp
>         movl    x+8, %eax
>         movl    %esp, %ebp
>         .p2align 4,,7
> .L5:
>         testl   %eax, %eax
>         jne     .L5
>         popl    %ebp
>         ret

Oh My God ! (tm)
That's exactly what 2.95.3 outputs for a *non* volatile array and is of
course badly wrong for a volatile one.

> I think people have come to accept it as legitimate, except for the
> versioning issue.  It's _supposed_ to be 2.95.x with a couple of bug
> fixes applied.

"supposed" is indeed the right wording...

--
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/