Re: [AD] C/Asm integration (was [AD] Improvement on alpha blending...)

Re: [AD] C/Asm integration (was [AD] Improvement on alpha blending...)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: Allegro Conductors <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] C/Asm integration (was [AD] Improvement on alpha blending...)
From: Bob <ohannessian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 19:46:48 -0400


Matthew Smith wrote:

Bob said,

[snip]

GCC always has cs=ds=es(=0?), if you are using another compiler (i.e. MSVC)
it is safe to use assembler (i.e. 386).  Is this an incomplete solution?

The video frame buffer may not have it's selector set to 0, which is whyI'm asking.


--
- Robert J Ohannessian
"Microsoft code is probably O(n^20)" (my CS prof)
http://pages.infinit.net/voidstar/

References:
- Re: [AD] C/Asm integration (was [AD] Improvement on alpha blending...)
  - From: Matthew Smith

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] some warnings catched by MSVC
Next by Date: Re: [AD] [From AL] Problems with Allegro(all3937.zip)
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] C/Asm integration (was [AD] Improvement on alpha blending...)
Next by thread: Re: [AD] C/Asm integration (was [AD] Improvement on alphablending...)

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/