Re: [AD] masked_blit 106% faster !!

Re: [AD] masked_blit 106% faster !!

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] masked_blit 106% faster !!
From: "Henrik Stokseth" <hstokset@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 14:46:52 -0700

Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Actually, my assembler doesn't seem to support SSE instructions.
> How do we test for it?

Why test for it? Couldn't we remove the mmx test as well and tell people to
use a faily new binutils? it just seems a little dumb to me to add tests we
don't really need.

-henrik

References:
- [AD] masked_blit 106% faster !!
  - From: Bob
- Re: [AD] masked_blit 106% faster !!
  - From: Bob
- Re: [AD] masked_blit 106% faster !!
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] masked_blit 106% faster !!
  - From: Peter Wang

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] demo
Next by Date: Re: [AD] masked_blit 106% faster !!
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] masked_blit 106% faster !!
Next by thread: Re: [AD] masked_blit 106% faster !!

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/